ARES vs. ASST
ARES (Ares Management Corporation) and ASST (Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock) are both stocks. ARES operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while ASST operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, ARES returned 7.32%/yr vs -59.43%/yr for ASST. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARES vs. ASST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARES achieves a -31.41% return, which is significantly lower than ASST's -21.27% return.
ARES
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -14.89%
- YTD
- -31.41%
- 6M
- -34.42%
- 1Y
- -34.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 27.74%
ASST
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -34.24%
- YTD
- -21.27%
- 6M
- -24.88%
- 1Y
- -85.14%
- 3Y*
- -59.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARES vs. ASST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | -31.41% | -5.72% | 52.68% | 45.17% |
ASST Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock | -21.27% | 50.46% | -84.65% | -89.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARES and ASST is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.08 |
Over the past year, ARES and ASST have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
ARES:
$2.82
ASST:
-$19.16
ARES:
3.76
ASST:
72.97
ARES:
$6.31B
ASST:
$5.73M
ARES:
$4.46B
ASST:
-$7.43M
ARES:
$2.42B
ASST:
-$304.63M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARES vs. ASST — Risk / Return Rank
ARES
ASST
ARES vs. ASST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARES | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.93 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | -0.89 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | -1.06 | -0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARES vs. ASST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARES drawdown since its inception was -49.73%, smaller than the maximum ASST drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARES and ASST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARES | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.73% | -98.78% | +49.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.05% | -95.98% | +46.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.73% | -97.25% | +47.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.25% | -98.02% | +55.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.40% | -90.48% | +79.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.91% | 80.34% | -54.43% |
Volatility
ARES vs. ASST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is 13.98%, while Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST) has a volatility of 25.82%. This indicates that ARES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARES | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.98% | 25.82% | -11.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.10% | 81.19% | -45.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.24% | 162.89% | -120.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.59% | 320.82% | -283.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.53% | 320.82% | -284.29% |
Dividends
ARES vs. ASST - Dividend Comparison
ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, while ASST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | 6.16% | 3.29% | 2.10% | 2.59% | 3.57% | 2.31% | 3.40% | 3.59% | 7.50% | 5.65% | 4.32% | 6.81% |
ASST Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ARES vs. ASST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ares Management Corporation and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ARES and ASST have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASST has higher volatility (25.82%) compared to ARES (13.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARES dropped -49.73% vs ASST's -98.78%.
ASST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARES and ASST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer