AREC vs. BITF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about American Resources Corporation (AREC) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF).

Performance

AREC vs. BITF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Resources Corporation (AREC) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AREC vs. BITF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AREC American Resources Corporation	-2.42%	145.54%	-32.21%	12.88%	-26.67%	-7.69%	209.52%	-93.70%	566.67%
BITF Bitfarms Ltd.	-17.02%	57.72%	-48.80%	561.36%	-91.29%	165.79%	397.66%	-27.96%	-64.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AREC : $204.02M BITF : $1.09B
EPS AREC : -$0.48 BITF : -$0.23
PS Ratio AREC : 1.39K BITF : 4.02
Total Revenue (TTM) AREC : $145.03K BITF : $270.06M
Gross Profit (TTM) AREC : $140.16K BITF : -$7.52M
EBITDA (TTM) AREC : -$22.47M BITF : -$4.06M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AREC achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly higher than BITF's -17.02% return.

AREC

• 1D: 8.04%
• 1M: -19.33%
• YTD: -2.42%
• 6M: -10.37%
• 1Y: 417.98%
• 3Y*: 17.28%
• 5Y*: -8.61%
• 10Y*: —

BITF

• 1D: 5.98%
• 1M: -11.36%
• YTD: -17.02%
• 6M: -30.85%
• 1Y: 147.40%
• 3Y*: 26.21%
• 5Y*: -17.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AREC vs. BITF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AREC

AREC Risk / Return Rank: 93
AREC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AREC Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
AREC Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AREC Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
AREC Martin Ratio Rank: 89

BITF

BITF Risk / Return Rank: 79
BITF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BITF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BITF Omega Ratio Rank: 79
BITF Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
BITF Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AREC vs. BITF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Resources Corporation (AREC) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AREC	BITF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	1.38	+1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	2.37	+1.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.28	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.73	1.78	+3.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.74	3.26	+6.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AREC vs. BITF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AREC Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the BITF Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AREC and BITF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AREC	BITF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	1.38	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	-0.16	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.00	+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between AREC and BITF is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AREC vs. BITF - Dividend Comparison

Neither AREC nor BITF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AREC vs. BITF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AREC drawdown since its inception was -97.12%, roughly equal to the maximum BITF drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AREC and BITF.

Drawdown Indicators

	AREC	BITF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.12%	-100.00%	+2.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.72%	-73.65%	+4.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.94%	-95.72%	+5.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.71%	-78.02%	-4.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-79.64%	-67.89%	-11.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.45%	40.30%	+0.15%

Volatility

AREC vs. BITF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Resources Corporation (AREC) is 21.41%, while Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) has a volatility of 25.86%. This indicates that AREC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AREC	BITF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.41%	25.86%	-4.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	97.71%	79.32%	+18.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	165.48%	107.74%	+57.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	107.24%	106.11%	+1.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	746.33%	748,086.06%	-747,339.73%

Financials