BITF vs. CLSK

In the year-to-date period, BITF achieves a -28.87% return, which is significantly lower than CLSK's 12.06% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BITF Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITF and CLSK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither BITF nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum BITF drawdown since its inception was -95.72%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITF and CLSK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) is 24.10%, while CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a volatility of 29.99%. This indicates that BITF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bitfarms Ltd. and CleanSpark, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.