BITF vs. CLSK
Compare and contrast key facts about Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BITF or CLSK.
Key characteristics
| BITF | CLSK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -22.16% | 35.81% |
| 1Y Return | 96.96% | 289.09% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -35.93% | -11.27% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 38.42% | 13.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.98 | 2.40 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.04 | 3.11 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.22 | 1.35 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.16 | 3.10 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.89 | 8.13 |
| Ulcer Index | 35.32% | 36.07% |
| Daily Std Dev | 104.30% | 122.35% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.72% | -98.56% |
| Current Drawdown | -74.46% | -79.35% |
Fundamentals
| BITF | CLSK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.24B | $4.55B |
| EPS | -$0.36 | -$0.99 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $139.15M | $289.69M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | -$20.10M | $74.44M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $47.11M | $136.86M |
Correlation
The correlation between BITF and CLSK is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BITF vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BITF achieves a -22.16% return, which is significantly lower than CLSK's 35.81% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BITF vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BITF vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison
Neither BITF nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITF Bitfarms Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.26% |
Drawdowns
BITF vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITF drawdown since its inception was -95.72%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITF and CLSK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BITF vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) is 38.91%, while CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a volatility of 44.64%. This indicates that BITF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BITF vs. CLSK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bitfarms Ltd. and CleanSpark, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities