PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BITF vs. HUT.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BITFHUT.TO
YTD Return-22.16%96.38%
1Y Return96.96%180.00%
3Y Return (Ann)-35.93%-28.77%
5Y Return (Ann)38.42%33.84%
Sharpe Ratio0.981.31
Sortino Ratio2.042.21
Omega Ratio1.221.25
Calmar Ratio1.161.63
Martin Ratio2.893.62
Ulcer Index35.32%41.15%
Daily Std Dev104.30%113.49%
Max Drawdown-95.72%-94.44%
Current Drawdown-74.46%-64.93%

Fundamentals


BITFHUT.TO
Market Cap$1.24BCA$3.20B
EPS-$0.36-CA$1.09
Total Revenue (TTM)$139.15MCA$122.76M
Gross Profit (TTM)-$20.10MCA$32.68M
EBITDA (TTM)$47.11MCA$6.70M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between BITF and HUT.TO is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BITF vs. HUT.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BITF achieves a -22.16% return, which is significantly lower than HUT.TO's 96.38% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
28.69%
178.02%
BITF
HUT.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BITF vs. HUT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) and Hut 8 Mining Corp. (HUT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BITF, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.91
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BITF, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.96
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BITF, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BITF, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BITF, currently valued at 2.64, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.64
HUT.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.63
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 3.56, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.56

BITF vs. HUT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITF Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the HUT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITF and HUT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.91
1.32
BITF
HUT.TO

Dividends

BITF vs. HUT.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither BITF nor HUT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BITF vs. HUT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITF drawdown since its inception was -95.72%, roughly equal to the maximum HUT.TO drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITF and HUT.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-74.46%
-68.82%
BITF
HUT.TO

Volatility

BITF vs. HUT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) has a higher volatility of 38.91% compared to Hut 8 Mining Corp. (HUT.TO) at 35.85%. This indicates that BITF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
38.91%
35.85%
BITF
HUT.TO

Financials

BITF vs. HUT.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bitfarms Ltd. and Hut 8 Mining Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. BITF values in USD, HUT.TO values in CAD