ARE vs. GPIQ
ARE (Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.) is a stock, while GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past year, ARE returned -31.93% vs 26.42% for GPIQ. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARE vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARE achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 14.10% return.
ARE
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- 6M
- -9.88%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 1Y
- -31.93%
- 3Y*
- -20.60%
- 5Y*
- -20.21%
- 10Y*
- -3.65%
GPIQ
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 1Y
- 26.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARE vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARE Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. | 5.44% | -46.60% | -19.44% | 39.18% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 14.10% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARE and GPIQ is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARE vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
ARE
GPIQ
ARE vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARE | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.30 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 2.79 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 11.26 | -12.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARE vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARE drawdown since its inception was -77.92%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARE and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARE | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.92% | -21.06% | -56.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.61% | -9.51% | -42.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.25% | -3.85% | -68.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.91% | -2.28% | -15.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.47% | 2.35% | +32.12% |
Volatility
ARE vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) has a higher volatility of 12.23% compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) at 6.67%. This indicates that ARE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARE | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.23% | 6.67% | +5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.29% | 13.44% | +18.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.90% | 15.94% | +28.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.39% | 17.95% | +15.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.42% | 17.95% | +11.47% |
Dividends
ARE vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
ARE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, less than GPIQ's 9.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARE Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. | 6.94% | 9.56% | 5.32% | 3.91% | 3.24% | 2.01% | 2.38% | 2.48% | 3.24% | 2.64% | 2.91% | 3.38% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.90% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARE and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARE has higher volatility (12.23%) compared to GPIQ (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARE dropped -77.92% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.
GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARE and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer