PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARE.TO vs. XENE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARE.TO vs. XENE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO) and Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. (XENE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ARE.TO is traded in CAD, while XENE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XENE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARE.TO achieves a 46.36% return, which is significantly higher than XENE's 17.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ARE.TO has outperformed XENE with an annualized return of 39.06%, while XENE has yielded a comparatively lower 22.90% annualized return.


ARE.TO

1D
2.22%
1M
-19.84%
YTD
46.36%
6M
54.44%
1Y
145.71%
3Y*
91.69%
5Y*
64.47%
10Y*
39.06%

XENE

1D
-2.17%
1M
-9.74%
YTD
17.23%
6M
15.95%
1Y
71.59%
3Y*
10.37%
5Y*
26.35%
10Y*
22.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARE.TO vs. XENE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARE.TO
Aecon Group Inc.
46.36%18.93%185.08%134.25%-10.60%37.60%33.22%28.75%-9.02%34.60%
XENE
Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
17.23%9.09%-7.58%14.24%35.21%101.28%15.33%97.55%142.31%-65.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ARE.TO and XENE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2014

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARE.TO:

CA$3.07B

XENE:

$4.52B

EPS

ARE.TO:

CA$0.53

XENE:

-$4.72

PB Ratio

ARE.TO:

2.87

XENE:

3.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARE.TO:

CA$5.63B

XENE:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARE.TO:

CA$398.23M

XENE:

-$78.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

ARE.TO:

CA$185.76M

XENE:

-$399.62M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARE.TO vs. XENE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARE.TO
ARE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ARE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ARE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

XENE
XENE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XENE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XENE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XENE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XENE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XENE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARE.TO vs. XENE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO) and Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. (XENE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARE.TOXENEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.36

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.98

4.66

+2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.75

9.99

+10.76

ARE.TO vs. XENE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.95, which is higher than the XENE Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARE.TO and XENE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARE.TOXENEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95

1.20

+2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.55

0.40

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.35

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.26

-0.17

Drawdowns

ARE.TO vs. XENE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARE.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.67%, which is greater than XENE's maximum drawdown of -89.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARE.TO and XENE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARE.TOXENEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.67%

-89.70%

-9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.58%

-15.45%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.21%

-41.47%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.21%

-41.47%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.21%

-78.70%

+34.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.84%

-15.45%

-4.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.46%

-36.38%

-34.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.23%

7.19%

+0.04%

Volatility

ARE.TO vs. XENE - Volatility Comparison

Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. (XENE) at 7.55%. This indicates that ARE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XENE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARE.TOXENEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.10%

7.55%

+3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.95%

46.25%

-20.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.23%

59.79%

-21.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.06%

66.71%

-24.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.64%

65.76%

-28.12%

Dividends

ARE.TO vs. XENE - Dividend Comparison

ARE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while XENE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARE.TO
Aecon Group Inc.
1.67%2.43%21.86%43.61%59.93%30.69%29.83%26.14%2.84%2.51%3.02%2.60%
XENE
Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ARE.TO vs. XENE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aecon Group Inc. and Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.26B
0
(ARE.TO) Total Revenue
(XENE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ARE.TO values in CAD, XENE values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ARE.TO and XENE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARE.TO and XENE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer