PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARCX vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARCX vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCX achieves a -60.14% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.78% return.


ARCX

1D
-5.46%
1M
-31.06%
YTD
-60.14%
6M
-68.25%
1Y
-84.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.40%
1M
3.71%
YTD
9.78%
6M
9.63%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
13.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARCX vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ARCX
Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF
-60.14%-71.53%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.78%22.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCX and YCS is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARCX vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARCX
ARCX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ARCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARCX vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARCXYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.35

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

3.79

-4.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

11.86

-13.08

ARCX vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCX and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARCX vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCX drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCX and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARCXYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.99%

-49.56%

-42.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.99%

-8.30%

-83.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.94%

0.00%

-90.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.37%

-19.88%

-45.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

69.52%

2.65%

+66.87%

Volatility

ARCX vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) has a higher volatility of 47.50% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.22%. This indicates that ARCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARCXYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

47.50%

2.22%

+45.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

89.91%

12.19%

+77.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

138.39%

16.96%

+121.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

140.88%

21.10%

+119.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

140.88%

18.96%

+121.92%

ARCX vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARCX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARCX vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARCX nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ARCX and YCS have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARCX has higher volatility (47.50%) compared to YCS (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCX dropped -91.99% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 31.36% vs -84.82% for ARCX. On fees, YCS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 31.36% return vs -84.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YCS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for ARCX.

ARCX and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ARCX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for ARCX and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARCX and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer