PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARCX vs. NVDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARCX vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCX achieves a -67.11% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG's 18.95% return.


ARCX

1D
-4.43%
1M
-13.26%
6M
-59.31%
YTD
-67.11%
1Y
-86.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-87.19%

NVDG

1D
7.27%
1M
23.11%
6M
38.73%
YTD
18.95%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$187.23K$373.70K$915.80K
$3.50M$4.23M$6.05M

ARCX vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ARCX
Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF
-67.11%-71.53%
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF
18.95%51.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCX and NVDG is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARCX vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARCX
ARCX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ARCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDG
NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARCX vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARCXNVDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.10

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

0.44

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

0.85

-2.06

ARCX vs. NVDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the NVDG Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCX and NVDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARCX vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCX drawdown since its inception was -94.32%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCX and NVDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARCXNVDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.32%

-66.19%

-28.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.63%

-42.72%

-50.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.52%

-18.32%

-74.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.32%

-23.52%

-44.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

71.56%

22.11%

+49.45%

Volatility

ARCX vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) has a higher volatility of 52.42% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) at 26.09%. This indicates that ARCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARCXNVDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

52.42%

26.09%

+26.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

99.72%

56.20%

+43.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

140.37%

72.44%

+67.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.28%

89.79%

+55.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.28%

89.79%

+55.49%

ARCX vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARCX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARCX vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison

ARCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.93%.


PositionTTM2025
ARCX
Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF
9.93%11.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARCX and NVDG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARCX has higher volatility (52.42%) compared to NVDG (26.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCX dropped -94.32% vs NVDG's -66.19%.

On 1-year performance, NVDG leads with 18.71% vs -86.80% for ARCX. On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NVDG has been the lower-risk option at 26.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDG has performed better with a 18.71% return vs -86.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for ARCX.

NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 9.93%, compared with 0.00% for ARCX.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for ARCX and 0.75% for NVDG.

NVDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARCX and NVDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer