ARCX vs. DLLL
ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ARCX is actively managed, while DLLL is passively managed. Over the past year, ARCX returned -85.69% vs 765.95% for DLLL. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARCX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DLLL.
Performance
ARCX vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARCX achieves a -62.89% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 762.51% return.
ARCX
- 1D
- -6.89%
- 1M
- -35.81%
- YTD
- -62.89%
- 6M
- -69.07%
- 1Y
- -85.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL
- 1D
- 4.21%
- 1M
- 89.37%
- YTD
- 762.51%
- 6M
- 738.64%
- 1Y
- 765.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARCX vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF | -62.89% | -71.53% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 762.51% | 6.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARCX and DLLL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARCX vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank
ARCX
DLLL
ARCX vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARCX | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.56 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 13.52 | -14.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 27.52 | -28.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARCX vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARCX drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, which is greater than DLLL's maximum drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCX and DLLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARCX | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.99% | -68.58% | -23.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.99% | -57.19% | -34.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.56% | -18.41% | -73.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.48% | -25.86% | -39.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 69.76% | 28.05% | +41.71% |
Volatility
ARCX vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) is 46.44%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 66.89%. This indicates that ARCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARCX | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.44% | 66.89% | -20.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 89.89% | 102.56% | -12.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.27% | 131.00% | +7.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 140.75% | 129.67% | +11.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 140.75% | 129.67% | +11.08% |
ARCX vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARCX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARCX vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARCX nor DLLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARCX and DLLL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLLL has higher volatility (66.89%) compared to ARCX (46.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCX dropped -91.99% vs DLLL's -68.58%.
On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 765.95% vs -85.69% for ARCX. On fees, ARCX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. On volatility, ARCX has been the lower-risk option at 46.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 765.95% return vs -85.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARCX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.
ARCX and DLLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for ARCX and 1.50% for DLLL.
DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.91 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARCX and DLLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer