ARCNX vs. QMHNX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ARCNX (AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N) and QMHNX (AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N) are both mutual funds - ARCNX is a Commodities fund managed by AQR, while QMHNX is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by AQR. Over the past 10 years, ARCNX returned 10.93%/yr vs 4.74%/yr for QMHNX. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. ARCNX charges 1.28%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for QMHNX.

Performance

ARCNX vs. QMHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCNX achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than QMHNX's 15.24% return. Over the past 10 years, ARCNX has outperformed QMHNX with an annualized return of 10.93%, while QMHNX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.74% annualized return.

ARCNX

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -7.89%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 11.57%
• 1Y: 25.84%
• 3Y*: 13.77%
• 5Y*: 14.41%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

QMHNX

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 15.24%
• 6M: 16.15%
• 1Y: 33.76%
• 3Y*: 15.00%
• 5Y*: 16.77%
• 10Y*: 4.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARCNX vs. QMHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ARCNX AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N	12.39%	20.76%	7.19%	-0.50%	20.97%	39.48%	8.11%	17.68%	-17.83%	10.20%
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N	15.24%	19.65%	10.48%	-0.40%	49.64%	-2.30%	-0.85%	1.55%	-14.59%	-2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCNX and QMHNX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	-0.00

The correlation between ARCNX and QMHNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ARCNX vs. QMHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARCNX

ARCNX Risk / Return Rank: 37
ARCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
ARCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
ARCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
ARCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
ARCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

QMHNX

QMHNX Risk / Return Rank: 87
QMHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QMHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
QMHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QMHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QMHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARCNX vs. QMHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARCNX	QMHNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	2.65	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	3.42	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.44	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	7.15	-4.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.39	20.60	-12.20

ARCNX vs. QMHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the QMHNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCNX and QMHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARCNX vs. QMHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCNX drawdown since its inception was -55.17%, which is greater than QMHNX's maximum drawdown of -40.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCNX and QMHNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARCNX	QMHNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.17%	-40.29%	-14.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.11%	-4.81%	-6.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.65%	-19.23%	+5.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.30%	-19.23%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.80%	-35.34%	+2.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.11%	-3.14%	-7.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.89%	-18.21%	-7.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	1.66%	+1.40%

Volatility

ARCNX vs. QMHNX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) have volatilities of 4.00% and 4.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARCNX	QMHNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	4.02%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.91%	9.87%	+3.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.27%	13.01%	+2.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.91%	17.26%	+1.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.42%	15.45%	+1.97%

ARCNX vs. QMHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARCNX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than QMHNX's 4.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARCNX vs. QMHNX - Dividend Comparison

ARCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.07%, more than QMHNX's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARCNX AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N	12.07%	13.57%	1.89%	7.45%	9.45%	18.31%	0.09%	4.98%	0.29%	0.01%	4.69%	0.00%
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N	1.64%	1.89%	2.09%	7.36%	8.75%	10.64%	7.79%	3.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	7.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARCNX and QMHNX in my portfolio?

ARCNX and QMHNX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARCNX or QMHNX?

QMHNX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to ARCNX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCNX dropped -55.17% vs QMHNX's -40.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.