ARCNX vs. QLFNX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ARCNX (AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N) and QLFNX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N) are both mutual funds - ARCNX is a Commodities fund managed by AQR, while QLFNX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARCNX charges 1.28%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for QLFNX.

Performance

ARCNX vs. QLFNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCNX achieves a 21.24% return, which is significantly higher than QLFNX's 0.75% return.

ARCNX

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 21.24%
• 6M: 23.89%
• 1Y: 40.32%
• 3Y*: 17.70%
• 5Y*: 15.00%
• 10Y*: 12.02%

QLFNX

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: 6.60%
• YTD: 0.75%
• 6M: 3.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARCNX vs. QLFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARCNX AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N	21.24%	5.43%
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N	0.75%	6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCNX and QLFNX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

ARCNX vs. QLFNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARCNX

ARCNX Risk / Return Rank: 84
ARCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ARCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ARCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ARCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ARCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARCNX vs. QLFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARCNX	QLFNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.00	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.67	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARCNX	QLFNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.92	-0.61

Drawdowns

ARCNX vs. QLFNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCNX drawdown since its inception was -55.17%, which is greater than QLFNX's maximum drawdown of -14.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCNX and QLFNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARCNX	QLFNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.17%	-14.54%	-40.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.11%	-0.49%	-3.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-5.74%	-20.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARCNX	QLFNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.68%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.00%	15.99%	-0.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.05%	15.99%	+3.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.44%	15.99%	+1.45%

ARCNX vs. QLFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARCNX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than QLFNX's 6.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARCNX vs. QLFNX - Dividend Comparison

ARCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.19%, more than QLFNX's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ARCNX AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N	11.19%	13.57%	1.89%	7.45%	9.45%	18.31%	0.09%	4.98%	0.29%	0.01%	4.69%
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N	0.14%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARCNX and QLFNX in my portfolio?

ARCNX and QLFNX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.