PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARCNX vs. GCCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARCNX vs. GCCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCNX achieves a 21.24% return, which is significantly higher than GCCIX's 18.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ARCNX has outperformed GCCIX with an annualized return of 12.02%, while GCCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.07% annualized return.


ARCNX

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
21.24%
6M
23.89%
1Y
40.32%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
15.00%
10Y*
12.02%

GCCIX

1D
0.82%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
18.82%
6M
19.60%
1Y
29.86%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARCNX vs. GCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARCNX
AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N
21.24%20.76%7.19%-0.50%20.97%39.48%8.11%17.68%-17.83%10.20%
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
18.82%15.45%5.92%-9.65%15.70%33.42%-23.01%16.75%-14.89%4.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCNX and GCCIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2012

0.76

The correlation between ARCNX and GCCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARCNX vs. GCCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARCNX
ARCNX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ARCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GCCIX
GCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARCNX vs. GCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARCNXGCCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.86

2.29

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.58

2.91

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.41

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

4.17

+0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.67

11.31

+6.36

ARCNX vs. GCCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the GCCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCNX and GCCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARCNXGCCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

2.29

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.56

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.25

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

-0.15

+0.46

Drawdowns

ARCNX vs. GCCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCNX drawdown since its inception was -55.17%, smaller than the maximum GCCIX drawdown of -90.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCNX and GCCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARCNXGCCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.17%

-90.80%

+35.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-7.48%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.65%

-11.89%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.30%

-28.78%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.80%

-57.76%

+24.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.11%

-70.56%

+66.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-69.43%

+43.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.76%

-0.42%

Volatility

ARCNX vs. GCCIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) have volatilities of 4.93% and 4.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARCNXGCCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

4.95%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

12.20%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

14.40%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.05%

18.48%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

20.02%

-2.58%

ARCNX vs. GCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARCNX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCIX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARCNX vs. GCCIX - Dividend Comparison

ARCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.19%, less than GCCIX's 13.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARCNX
AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N
11.19%13.57%1.89%7.45%9.45%18.31%0.09%4.98%0.29%0.01%4.69%0.00%
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
13.54%16.09%4.08%4.20%10.41%16.46%0.36%10.81%1.47%5.88%0.84%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ARCNX and GCCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GCCIX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to ARCNX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCNX dropped -55.17% vs GCCIX's -90.80%.

ARCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARCNX and GCCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer