ARCK.L vs. MWRD.L
ARCK.L (ARK Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and MWRD.L (Amundi Index MSCI World) are both Global Equities funds. ARCK.L is actively managed, while MWRD.L is passively managed. ARCK.L charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for MWRD.L.
Performance
ARCK.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARCK.L
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 48.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MWRD.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARCK.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ARCK.L ARK Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 9.12% | 27.55% | 32.38% |
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARCK.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
ARCK.L
MWRD.L
ARCK.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ARCK.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARCK.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.77 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARCK.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ARCK.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARCK.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.10% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.64% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.30% | — | — |
Volatility
ARCK.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARCK.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.05% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.12% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.12% | — | — |
ARCK.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARCK.L has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARCK.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARCK.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for ARCK.L.
They also come from different issuers: ARK Invest and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for ARCK.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.
Find the right allocation for ARCK.L and MWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer