ARCK.L vs. PRWU.L
ARCK.L (ARK Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and PRWU.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Global Equities funds. ARCK.L is actively managed, while PRWU.L is passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARCK.L charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRWU.L.
Performance
ARCK.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ARCK.L is traded in GBp, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
ARCK.L
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 5.07%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 42.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRWU.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARCK.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ARCK.L ARK Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 5.07% | 27.55% | 32.38% |
PRWU.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARCK.L and PRWU.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARCK.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank
ARCK.L
PRWU.L
ARCK.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ARCK.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARCK.L | PRWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.57 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARCK.L | PRWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ARCK.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARCK.L | PRWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.73% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.61% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.24% | — | — |
Volatility
ARCK.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARCK.L | PRWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.97% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.10% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.10% | — | — |
ARCK.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARCK.L has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARCK.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARCK.L nor PRWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARCK.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for ARCK.L.
They also come from different issuers: ARK Invest and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for ARCK.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.
Find the right allocation for ARCK.L and PRWU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer