PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARB vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARB vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARB achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return.


ARB

1D
0.03%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.70%
6M
2.28%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
6.40%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*

USO

1D
2.62%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
103.67%
6M
99.35%
1Y
101.55%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARB vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ARB
AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF
1.70%6.05%4.07%3.85%2.67%3.16%3.78%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
103.67%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%61.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ARB and USO is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2020

0.03

The correlation between ARB and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARB vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARB
ARB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ARB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARB Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ARB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARB Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARB vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARBUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.17

5.01

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.90

9.42

+11.48

ARB vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARB Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARB and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARBUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.31

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.68

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

-0.18

+1.13

Drawdowns

ARB vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARB drawdown since its inception was -5.60%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARB and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARBUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-98.19%

+92.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.69%

-20.39%

+19.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.13%

-26.05%

+23.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.60%

-36.23%

+30.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-85.01%

+84.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.94%

-75.30%

+74.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

10.82%

-10.58%

Volatility

ARB vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) is 1.28%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that ARB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARBUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

14.87%

-13.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.38%

38.23%

-35.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89%

44.20%

-41.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.40%

36.06%

-31.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.40%

39.00%

-34.60%

ARB vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARB has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARB vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

ARB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ARB
AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.43%0.43%1.12%0.00%4.18%0.00%2.87%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARB and USO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to ARB (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARB dropped -5.60% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 5-year performance, USO leads with 24.41% vs 3.87% for ARB. On fees, USO is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, ARB has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USO has performed better with a 24.41% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USO is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for ARB.

ARB has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

ARB is categorized as Hedge Fund, while USO is Oil & Gas. ARB tracks Water Island Merger Arbitrage USD Hedged Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Water Island Capital Partners LP and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for ARB and 0.86% for USO.

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARB and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer