ARB vs. OILK
ARB (AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARB is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the Water Island Merger Arbitrage USD Hedged Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ARB returned 3.87%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARB charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
ARB vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARB achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
ARB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
ARB vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARB AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF | 1.70% | 6.05% | 4.07% | 3.85% | 2.67% | 3.16% | 3.78% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | 67.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARB and OILK is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2020 | 0.03 |
The correlation between ARB and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ARB vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARB
OILK
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
ARB
OILK
-
Healthcare
ARB
OILK
-
Technology
ARB
OILK
-
Industrials
ARB
OILK
-
Communication Services
ARB
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
ARB
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
ARB
OILK
Basic Materials
ARB
OILK
-
Utilities
ARB
OILK
-
Real Estate
ARB
OILK
-
Energy
ARB
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARB vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
ARB
OILK
ARB vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.17 | 3.42 | +3.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.90 | 6.91 | +13.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.06 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.59 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.12 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
ARB vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARB drawdown since its inception was -5.60%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARB and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.60% | -83.76% | +78.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.69% | -17.35% | +16.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.13% | -23.42% | +21.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.60% | -34.69% | +29.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -3.66% | +3.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.94% | -32.61% | +31.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 8.56% | -8.32% |
Volatility
ARB vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) is 1.28%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that ARB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 10.44% | -9.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.38% | 23.26% | -20.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89% | 28.75% | -25.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.40% | 30.12% | -25.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.40% | 35.97% | -31.57% |
ARB vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARB has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARB vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
ARB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARB AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF | 0.43% | 0.43% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 4.18% | 0.00% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARB and OILK have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to ARB (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARB dropped -5.60% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 3.87% for ARB. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, ARB has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for ARB.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.43% for ARB.
ARB is categorized as Hedge Fund, while OILK is Oil & Gas. ARB tracks Water Island Merger Arbitrage USD Hedged Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Water Island Capital Partners LP and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for ARB and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARB and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer