ARAW.DE vs. LI.PA
ARAW.DE (abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF) is Materials fund actively managed by abrdn, while LI.PA (Klepierre SA) is a stock. Over the past year, ARAW.DE returned 137.40% vs 9.09% for LI.PA. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARAW.DE vs. LI.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARAW.DE achieves a 26.31% return, which is significantly higher than LI.PA's 5.84% return.
ARAW.DE
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 26.31%
- 6M
- 36.73%
- 1Y
- 137.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LI.PA
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 5.84%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 9.09%
- 3Y*
- 22.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 4.04%
ARAW.DE vs. LI.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARAW.DE abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF | 26.31% | 94.76% |
LI.PA Klepierre SA | 5.84% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARAW.DE and LI.PA is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARAW.DE vs. LI.PA — Risk / Return Rank
ARAW.DE
LI.PA
ARAW.DE vs. LI.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) and Klepierre SA (LI.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARAW.DE | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.11 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.69 | 0.81 | +5.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.81 | 1.75 | +24.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARAW.DE | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36 | 0.56 | +3.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.33 | 0.36 | +3.97 |
Drawdowns
ARAW.DE vs. LI.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARAW.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, smaller than the maximum LI.PA drawdown of -79.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARAW.DE and LI.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARAW.DE | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.41% | -79.99% | +59.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.41% | -11.08% | -9.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.46% | -1.75% | -2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -18.41% | +15.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 5.16% | +0.14% |
Volatility
ARAW.DE vs. LI.PA - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.01% compared to Klepierre SA (LI.PA) at 3.90%. This indicates that ARAW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LI.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARAW.DE | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.01% | 3.90% | +7.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.93% | 12.95% | +12.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.38% | 16.02% | +15.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.66% | 26.03% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.66% | 35.71% | -5.05% |
Dividends
ARAW.DE vs. LI.PA - Dividend Comparison
ARAW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LI.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARAW.DE abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LI.PA Klepierre SA | 5.40% | 5.48% | 3.60% | 6.93% | 7.90% | 4.80% | 7.35% | 6.20% | 7.27% | 4.96% | 4.55% | 3.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARAW.DE and LI.PA have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ARAW.DE and LI.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer