ARAW.DE vs. LSMC.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE).

ARAW.DE and LSMC.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ARAW.DE is an actively managed fund by abrdn. It was launched on May 9, 2025. LSMC.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. It was launched on Jul 3, 2020.

Performance

ARAW.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ARAW.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARAW.DE abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF	17.38%	94.76%
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	7.99%	42.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARAW.DE achieves a 17.38% return, which is significantly higher than LSMC.DE's 7.99% return.

ARAW.DE

• 1D: 4.84%
• 1M: -10.54%
• YTD: 17.38%
• 6M: 46.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LSMC.DE

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: -2.83%
• YTD: 7.99%
• 6M: 18.35%
• 1Y: 77.01%
• 3Y*: 47.36%
• 5Y*: 25.66%
• 10Y*: 23.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARAW.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ARAW.DE and LSMC.DE have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

ARAW.DE

abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF

LSMC.DE

Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

ARAW.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSMC.DE

LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 93
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 87
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARAW.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARAW.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.00	0.71	+4.29

Correlation

The correlation between ARAW.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ARAW.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARAW.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ARAW.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARAW.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARAW.DE and LSMC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARAW.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.41%	-39.77%	+19.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.77%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.61%	-7.15%	-3.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.70%	-9.45%	+6.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARAW.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	22.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.33%	34.41%	-4.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.33%	30.93%	-0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.33%	25.73%	+4.60%