AQST vs. SLVP
AQST (Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.) is a stock, while SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Over the past 5 years, AQST returned 1.72%/yr vs 15.97%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AQST vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AQST achieves a -37.62% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's 2.25% return.
AQST
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- YTD
- -37.62%
- 6M
- -34.47%
- 1Y
- 26.73%
- 3Y*
- 21.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- —
SLVP
- 1D
- -5.14%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 112.07%
- 3Y*
- 52.07%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
AQST vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQST Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. | -37.62% | 81.46% | 76.24% | 123.92% | -76.81% | -27.29% | -8.08% | -7.62% | -60.75% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.25% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -14.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between AQST and SLVP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AQST vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
AQST
SLVP
AQST vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. (AQST) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AQST | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 3.36 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.86 | 8.53 | -7.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AQST | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 2.12 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.38 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | 0.09 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
AQST vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AQST drawdown since its inception was -96.68%, which is greater than SLVP's maximum drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQST and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AQST | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.68% | -80.47% | -16.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.61% | -33.57% | -27.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.55% | -33.57% | -29.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.11% | -54.78% | -35.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.74% | -26.25% | -52.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.96% | -46.82% | -30.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.09% | 13.18% | +17.91% |
Volatility
AQST vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. (AQST) has a higher volatility of 20.41% compared to iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) at 17.59%. This indicates that AQST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AQST | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.41% | 17.59% | +2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.93% | 43.22% | +25.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.21% | 53.06% | +33.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.64% | 42.76% | +39.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.78% | 42.24% | +45.54% |
Dividends
AQST vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
AQST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQST Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.74% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AQST and SLVP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AQST has higher volatility (20.41%) compared to SLVP (17.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQST dropped -96.68% vs SLVP's -80.47%.
SLVP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AQST and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer