PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQMNX vs. QNZIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AQMNX vs. QNZIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I (QNZIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQMNX achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly lower than QNZIX's 11.70% return.


AQMNX

1D
-1.43%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
8.86%
6M
9.33%
1Y
21.36%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
4.02%

QNZIX

1D
-1.43%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.49%
1Y
30.93%
3Y*
28.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQMNX vs. QNZIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AQMNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N
8.86%14.38%7.96%1.79%16.96%
QNZIX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I
11.70%23.26%35.22%23.03%1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between AQMNX and QNZIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022

0.38

Over the past year, AQMNX and QNZIX have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AQMNX vs. QNZIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQMNX
AQMNX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AQMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AQMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

QNZIX
QNZIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
QNZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QNZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQMNX vs. QNZIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I (QNZIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AQMNXQNZIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.50

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.41

5.40

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.75

22.15

-1.40

AQMNX vs. QNZIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the QNZIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQMNX and QNZIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AQMNX vs. QNZIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQMNX drawdown since its inception was -27.50%, which is greater than QNZIX's maximum drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQMNX and QNZIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AQMNXQNZIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.50%

-18.35%

-9.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.09%

-5.87%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.70%

-13.51%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.09%

-5.87%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-2.77%

-7.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.43%

-0.37%

Volatility

AQMNX vs. QNZIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) is 3.30%, while AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I (QNZIX) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that AQMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QNZIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AQMNXQNZIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

4.03%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.07%

7.85%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.03%

11.26%

-2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.55%

12.09%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.20%

12.09%

-1.89%

AQMNX vs. QNZIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQMNX has a 2.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QNZIX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

AQMNX vs. QNZIX - Dividend Comparison

AQMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than QNZIX's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQMNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N
1.88%2.05%3.61%8.15%12.59%6.59%4.17%2.92%0.00%0.00%0.02%6.30%
QNZIX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I
0.96%1.07%16.81%23.32%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AQMNX and QNZIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QNZIX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to AQMNX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQMNX dropped -27.50% vs QNZIX's -18.35%.

QNZIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AQMNX and QNZIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer