PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQMIX vs. QLENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AQMIX vs. QLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AQMIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQMIX achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly higher than QLENX's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, AQMIX has underperformed QLENX with an annualized return of 5.00%, while QLENX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.73% annualized return.


AQMIX

1D
0.46%
1M
1.22%
YTD
12.96%
6M
14.94%
1Y
24.94%
3Y*
12.51%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
5.00%

QLENX

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.51%
YTD
0.29%
6M
4.65%
1Y
15.75%
3Y*
27.39%
5Y*
21.63%
10Y*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQMIX vs. QLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AQMIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund
12.96%14.62%8.13%2.08%35.47%-1.04%-0.43%1.92%-8.88%-0.97%
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity N
0.29%34.07%30.18%23.67%18.92%30.70%-14.18%1.01%-16.64%15.48%

Correlation

The correlation between AQMIX and QLENX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2013

0.18

The correlation between AQMIX and QLENX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AQMIX vs. QLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQMIX
AQMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AQMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AQMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

QLENX
QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQMIX vs. QLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AQMIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AQMIXQLENXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.90

2.21

+0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.96

3.25

+0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.40

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.34

2.62

+5.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

25.80

8.18

+17.62

AQMIX vs. QLENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is higher than the QLENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQMIX and QLENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AQMIXQLENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

2.21

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

2.16

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

1.11

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

1.22

-0.80

Drawdowns

AQMIX vs. QLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQMIX drawdown since its inception was -26.52%, smaller than the maximum QLENX drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQMIX and QLENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AQMIXQLENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.52%

-38.50%

+11.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-6.09%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.57%

-7.09%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.57%

-17.19%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.34%

-38.50%

+15.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.34%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-7.48%

-2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.95%

-0.98%

Volatility

AQMIX vs. QLENX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AQMIX) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) at 2.21%. This indicates that AQMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AQMIXQLENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.21%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.60%

5.60%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

7.27%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.62%

10.08%

+1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.37%

10.59%

-0.22%

AQMIX vs. QLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQMIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QLENX's 5.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

AQMIX vs. QLENX - Dividend Comparison

AQMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than QLENX's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQMIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.00%2.26%3.83%8.39%12.76%6.94%5.31%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.02%6.51%
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity N
1.63%1.64%7.13%21.21%14.09%0.00%1.59%0.00%6.09%8.91%2.87%4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


AQMIX and QLENX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AQMIX has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to QLENX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQMIX dropped -26.52% vs QLENX's -38.50%.

AQMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AQMIX and QLENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer