PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQLGX vs. RYGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AQLGX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alta Quality Growth Fund (AQLGX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AQLGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RYGRX

1D
0.92%
1M
11.15%
YTD
30.14%
6M
30.55%
1Y
37.82%
3Y*
25.67%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQLGX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AQLGX
Alta Quality Growth Fund
0.00%8.35%13.01%30.70%-29.35%20.05%20.21%34.04%2.12%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
30.14%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AQLGX and RYGRX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2018

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between AQLGX and RYGRX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AQLGX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQLGX

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQLGX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alta Quality Growth Fund (AQLGX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AQLGX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AQLGXRYGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

Drawdowns

AQLGX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AQLGXRYGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

Volatility

AQLGX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AQLGXRYGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.88%

AQLGX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQLGX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

AQLGX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

AQLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.67%, more than RYGRX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQLGX
Alta Quality Growth Fund
85.67%85.67%9.23%0.11%6.55%1.90%0.05%2.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
3.91%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


AQLGX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AQLGX and RYGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer