PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQGRX vs. CAEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AQGRX vs. CAEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Global Equity Fund Class R6 (AQGRX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQGRX achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly lower than CAEIX's 22.32% return. Over the past 10 years, AQGRX has outperformed CAEIX with an annualized return of 13.63%, while CAEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.76% annualized return.


AQGRX

1D
-0.85%
1M
5.53%
YTD
12.98%
6M
14.49%
1Y
33.14%
3Y*
28.27%
5Y*
15.42%
10Y*
13.63%

CAEIX

1D
-0.64%
1M
2.03%
YTD
22.32%
6M
22.00%
1Y
47.35%
3Y*
13.66%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
11.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQGRX vs. CAEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AQGRX
AQR Global Equity Fund Class R6
12.98%31.87%24.60%23.14%-14.13%18.43%9.47%23.85%-14.46%25.57%
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
22.32%32.61%-7.13%5.67%-17.43%6.73%61.52%33.48%-19.26%29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AQGRX and CAEIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.82

The correlation between AQGRX and CAEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AQGRX vs. CAEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQGRX
AQGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AQGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AQGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CAEIX
CAEIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CAEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CAEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQGRX vs. CAEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Global Equity Fund Class R6 (AQGRX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AQGRXCAEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.50

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

5.76

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.45

19.89

-4.45

AQGRX vs. CAEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the CAEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQGRX and CAEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AQGRXCAEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.94

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.32

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.60

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.07

+0.60

Drawdowns

AQGRX vs. CAEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQGRX drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, smaller than the maximum CAEIX drawdown of -75.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQGRX and CAEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AQGRXCAEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-75.81%

+41.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-8.39%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.51%

-24.57%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-32.58%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.25%

-37.54%

+3.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.64%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.88%

-48.63%

+41.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.43%

-0.29%

Volatility

AQGRX vs. CAEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Global Equity Fund Class R6 (AQGRX) is 3.46%, while Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that AQGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AQGRXCAEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

5.77%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

12.87%

-2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

16.45%

-3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

19.18%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

19.69%

-1.86%

AQGRX vs. CAEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQGRX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than CAEIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

AQGRX vs. CAEIX - Dividend Comparison

AQGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.61%, more than CAEIX's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQGRX
AQR Global Equity Fund Class R6
11.61%13.12%13.59%6.03%4.51%12.19%1.34%2.41%4.88%5.03%10.54%0.09%
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
0.59%0.72%1.17%1.07%0.86%0.49%0.82%1.23%2.00%1.40%1.79%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


AQGRX and CAEIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAEIX has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to AQGRX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQGRX dropped -34.25% vs CAEIX's -75.81%.

CAEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AQGRX and CAEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer