APRZ vs. KNOV
APRZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF) and KNOV (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November) are both Defined Outcome funds. APRZ is passively managed, while KNOV is actively managed. Over the past year, APRZ returned 20.17% vs 24.28% for KNOV. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
APRZ vs. KNOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APRZ achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than KNOV's 8.98% return.
APRZ
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 7.28%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- —
KNOV
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 24.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRZ vs. KNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
APRZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF | 7.43% | 12.97% | 1.91% |
KNOV Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November | 8.98% | 11.91% | 1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between APRZ and KNOV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024 | 0.80 |
The correlation between APRZ and KNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APRZ vs. KNOV — Risk / Return Rank
APRZ
KNOV
APRZ vs. KNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APRZ | KNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 4.55 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.13 | 15.82 | -5.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APRZ | KNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.15 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 1.12 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
APRZ vs. KNOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APRZ drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than KNOV's maximum drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRZ and KNOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APRZ | KNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -15.03% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -5.36% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.54% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -2.61% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 1.54% | +0.46% |
Volatility
APRZ vs. KNOV - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) has a higher volatility of 2.39% compared to Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) at 2.23%. This indicates that APRZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APRZ | KNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.39% | 2.23% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.06% | 6.90% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.23% | 11.37% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.52% | 12.86% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 12.86% | -0.44% |
APRZ vs. KNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both APRZ and KNOV have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
APRZ vs. KNOV - Dividend Comparison
APRZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while KNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APRZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF | 3.12% | 3.35% | 2.78% | 2.89% | 0.59% |
KNOV Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APRZ and KNOV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APRZ has higher volatility (2.39%) compared to KNOV (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRZ dropped -18.15% vs KNOV's -15.03%.
On 1-year performance, KNOV leads with 24.28% vs 20.17% for APRZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, KNOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KNOV has performed better with a 24.28% return vs 20.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
APRZ and KNOV have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
APRZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.00% for KNOV.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator.
KNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APRZ and KNOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer