PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRQ vs. MSFO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRQ vs. MSFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


APRQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSFO

1D
-3.34%
1M
4.46%
YTD
-6.57%
6M
-7.03%
1Y
-1.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRQ vs. MSFO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRQ vs. MSFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRQ

MSFO
MSFO Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRQ vs. MSFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APRQ vs. MSFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRQMSFODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

Drawdowns

APRQ vs. MSFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum MSFO drawdown of -29.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRQ and MSFO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRQMSFODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-29.29%

+29.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.39%

+14.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-6.55%

+6.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.12%

Volatility

APRQ vs. MSFO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRQMSFODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

21.33%

-21.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

19.72%

-19.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

19.72%

-19.72%

APRQ vs. MSFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFO's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRQ vs. MSFO - Dividend Comparison

APRQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.58%.


PositionTTM202520242023
APRQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFO
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
37.58%33.91%35.15%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, APRQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFO.

MSFO has the higher dividend yield at 37.58%, compared with 0.00% for APRQ.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRQ and 0.99% for MSFO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRQ and MSFO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer