APRQ vs. LAPR
APRQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April) and LAPR (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
APRQ vs. LAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APRQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LAPR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 3.36%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRQ vs. LAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% |
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April | 2.94% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APRQ vs. LAPR — Risk / Return Rank
APRQ
LAPR
APRQ vs. LAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APRQ | LAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.98 | — |
Drawdowns
APRQ vs. LAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APRQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum LAPR drawdown of -3.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRQ and LAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APRQ | LAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -3.81% | +3.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.08% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.11% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
APRQ vs. LAPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APRQ | LAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 1.26% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 3.30% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 3.30% | -3.30% |
APRQ vs. LAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both APRQ and LAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
APRQ vs. LAPR - Dividend Comparison
APRQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LAPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April | 5.52% | 5.40% | 4.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRQ and LAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
LAPR has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 0.00% for APRQ.
Find the right allocation for APRQ and LAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer