LAPR vs. NVDY
LAPR (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April) and NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LAPR returned 7.17% vs 52.45% for NVDY. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVDY.
Performance
LAPR vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAPR achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly lower than NVDY's 15.63% return.
LAPR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 3.36%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDY
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- 15.63%
- 6M
- 19.60%
- 1Y
- 52.45%
- 3Y*
- 55.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LAPR vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April | 3.36% | 5.81% | 4.82% |
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 15.63% | 27.38% | 37.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAPR and NVDY is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAPR vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank
LAPR
NVDY
LAPR vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAPR | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.70 | 1.93 | +3.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 12.42 | 2.52 | +9.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.99 | 1.32 | +1.67 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 30.20 | 4.29 | +25.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 151.22 | 10.62 | +140.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAPR | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.70 | 1.93 | +3.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.98 | 1.67 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
LAPR vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAPR drawdown since its inception was -3.81%, smaller than the maximum NVDY drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAPR and NVDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAPR | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -34.08% | +30.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.24% | -12.81% | +12.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -4.54% | +4.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -6.15% | +6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 5.18% | -5.13% |
Volatility
LAPR vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) is 0.33%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that LAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAPR | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 9.09% | -8.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.99% | 20.58% | -19.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26% | 27.28% | -26.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 38.24% | -34.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 38.24% | -34.94% |
LAPR vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
LAPR vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison
LAPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, less than NVDY's 60.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April | 5.52% | 5.40% | 4.21% | 0.00% |
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 60.00% | 83.10% | 83.65% | 22.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LAPR and NVDY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDY has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to LAPR (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAPR dropped -3.81% vs NVDY's -34.08%.
On 1-year performance, NVDY leads with 52.45% vs 7.17% for LAPR. On fees, LAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, LAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 52.45% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDY.
NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 60.00%, compared with 5.52% for LAPR.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for LAPR and 0.99% for NVDY.
LAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.70 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAPR and NVDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer