PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRQ vs. IFEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRQ vs. IFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


APRQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IFEB

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.98%
YTD
2.84%
6M
3.95%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRQ vs. IFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


APRQ vs. IFEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
APRQ
IFEB

Technology

32.0%
10.3%

Financial Services

13.7%
24.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
7.7%

Healthcare

10.5%
10.6%

Communication Services

9.9%
4.5%

Industrials

7.4%
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
6.7%

Energy

3.2%
4.0%

Utilities

2.5%
4.0%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.7%
5.9%

Technology

APRQ
32.0%
IFEB
10.3%

Financial Services

APRQ
13.7%
IFEB
24.7%

Consumer Cyclical

APRQ
11.6%
IFEB
7.7%

Healthcare

APRQ
10.5%
IFEB
10.6%

Communication Services

APRQ
9.9%
IFEB
4.5%

Industrials

APRQ
7.4%
IFEB
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

APRQ
5.5%
IFEB
6.7%

Energy

APRQ
3.2%
IFEB
4.0%

Utilities

APRQ
2.5%
IFEB
4.0%

Real Estate

APRQ
2.1%
IFEB
1.9%

Basic Materials

APRQ
1.7%
IFEB
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRQ vs. IFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRQ

IFEB
IFEB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRQ vs. IFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APRQ vs. IFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRQIFEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

Drawdowns

APRQ vs. IFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum IFEB drawdown of -8.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRQ and IFEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRQIFEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-8.84%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.41%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-1.68%

+1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

Volatility

APRQ vs. IFEB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRQIFEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

7.55%

-7.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

9.09%

-9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

9.09%

-9.09%

APRQ vs. IFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than IFEB's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRQ vs. IFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRQ nor IFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, APRQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IFEB.

APRQ and IFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRQ and 0.85% for IFEB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRQ and IFEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer