APRQ vs. FFTY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

APRQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APRQ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. APRQ is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. APRQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.

Performance

APRQ vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

APRQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFTY

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: 8.42%
• YTD: 20.28%
• 6M: 21.99%
• 1Y: 39.43%
• 3Y*: 21.63%
• 5Y*: -0.31%
• 10Y*: 7.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRQ vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April	0.00%
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	14.93%

APRQ vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	APRQ	FFTY
Technology	32.0%	24.8%
Financial Services	13.7%	13.1%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	4.8%
Healthcare	10.5%	12.1%
Communication Services	9.9%	3.7%
Industrials	7.4%	26.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	-
Energy	3.2%	8.0%
Utilities	2.5%	2.1%
Real Estate	2.1%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	21.6%

Return for Risk

APRQ vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 32
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRQ vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APRQ	FFTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.20	—

Drawdowns

APRQ vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRQ and FFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	APRQ	FFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-59.46%	+59.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-23.29%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-59.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-15.22%	+15.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-22.38%	+22.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.77%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	APRQ	FFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	26.22%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	34.12%	-34.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	29.14%	-29.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	27.42%	-27.42%

APRQ vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

APRQ vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

APRQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	1.12%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, APRQ or FFTY?

On fees, APRQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, APRQ or FFTY?

APRQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APRQ or FFTY?

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for APRQ.

What is the main difference between APRQ and FFTY?

APRQ is categorized as Options Trading, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRQ and 0.80% for FFTY.