PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRJ vs. VRIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRJ vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRJ achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly higher than VRIG's 1.81% return.


APRJ

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.70%
YTD
3.18%
6M
3.64%
1Y
6.91%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
10Y*

VRIG

1D
0.02%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.81%
6M
2.20%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRJ vs. VRIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
APRJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April
3.18%5.71%6.24%5.38%
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
1.81%5.05%6.81%5.85%

Correlation

The correlation between APRJ and VRIG is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2023

0.11

The correlation between APRJ and VRIG shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

APRJ vs. VRIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
APRJ
VRIG

Technology

33.6%
0.4%

Financial Services

12.4%
23.3%

Communication Services

10.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
3.0%

Healthcare

9.5%

-

Industrials

8.5%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
0.7%

Energy

4.0%

-

Utilities

2.5%
0.1%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.3%

Basic Materials

1.9%
0.8%

Technology

APRJ
33.6%
VRIG
0.4%

Financial Services

APRJ
12.4%
VRIG
23.3%

Communication Services

APRJ
10.5%
VRIG

-

Consumer Cyclical

APRJ
10.0%
VRIG
3.0%

Healthcare

APRJ
9.5%
VRIG

-

Industrials

APRJ
8.5%
VRIG
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

APRJ
5.3%
VRIG
0.7%

Energy

APRJ
4.0%
VRIG

-

Utilities

APRJ
2.5%
VRIG
0.1%

Real Estate

APRJ
2.0%
VRIG
0.3%

Basic Materials

APRJ
1.9%
VRIG
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRJ vs. VRIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRJ
APRJ Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VRIG
VRIG Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VRIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRIG Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VRIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRIG Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRJ vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APRJVRIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-15.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.20

5.38

-3.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

34.55

62.75

-28.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

103.47

320.64

-217.17

APRJ vs. VRIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRJ Sharpe Ratio is 4.63, which is lower than the VRIG Sharpe Ratio of 10.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRJ and VRIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRJVRIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63

10.15

-5.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.80

0.91

+0.89

Drawdowns

APRJ vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRJ drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum VRIG drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRJ and VRIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRJVRIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-13.04%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.20%

-0.08%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

-0.78%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-0.27%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.02%

+0.05%

Volatility

APRJ vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) has a higher volatility of 0.47% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) at 0.11%. This indicates that APRJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRJVRIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

0.11%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

0.36%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50%

0.49%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.63%

1.29%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.63%

3.80%

-0.17%

APRJ vs. VRIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VRIG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRJ vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison

APRJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than VRIG's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
APRJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April
5.27%5.46%5.88%4.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
4.79%4.99%6.09%5.97%2.39%0.78%1.57%3.12%2.89%2.31%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


APRJ and VRIG have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APRJ has higher volatility (0.47%) compared to VRIG (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRJ dropped -4.68% vs VRIG's -13.04%.

On 3-year performance, APRJ leads with 6.35% vs 5.98% for VRIG. On fees, VRIG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, VRIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, APRJ has performed better with a 6.35% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VRIG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRJ.

APRJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 4.79% for VRIG.

APRJ is categorized as Options Trading, while VRIG is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRJ and 0.30% for VRIG.

VRIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.15 vs 4.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRJ and VRIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer