PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFG vs. HOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BUFG vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF (BUFG) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BUFG vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


BUFG

1D
2.17%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
-2.40%
6M
-0.30%
1Y
12.91%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
10Y*

HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUFG vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFG has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BUFG vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFG
BUFG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BUFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFG Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

HOCT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFG vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF (BUFG) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFGHOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.47

BUFG vs. HOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFGHOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

Dividends

BUFG vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFG nor HOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BUFG vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFG drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFG and HOCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFGHOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

0.00%

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

0.00%

-3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

0.00%

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

Volatility

BUFG vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BUFGHOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

0.00%

+12.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.00%

0.00%

+12.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.00%

0.00%

+12.00%