PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFG vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFG vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF (BUFG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFG achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 11.69% return.


BUFG

1D
0.03%
1M
2.54%
YTD
6.72%
6M
7.58%
1Y
18.52%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
10Y*

SPY

1D
0.14%
1M
5.40%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.09%
1Y
29.62%
3Y*
22.64%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
15.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFG vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BUFG
FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF
6.72%12.33%15.13%18.49%-11.61%1.80%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFG and SPY is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021

0.95

The correlation between BUFG and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUFG vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUFG
SPY

Technology

36.2%
35.9%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.8%

Communication Services

10.9%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.8%

Energy

3.5%
3.6%

Utilities

2.3%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

BUFG
36.2%
SPY
35.9%

Financial Services

BUFG
11.9%
SPY
11.8%

Communication Services

BUFG
10.9%
SPY
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BUFG
10.1%
SPY
10.3%

Healthcare

BUFG
8.4%
SPY
8.4%

Industrials

BUFG
8.1%
SPY
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

BUFG
4.9%
SPY
4.8%

Energy

BUFG
3.5%
SPY
3.6%

Utilities

BUFG
2.3%
SPY
2.4%

Real Estate

BUFG
1.9%
SPY
1.9%

Basic Materials

BUFG
1.8%
SPY
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFG vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFG
BUFG Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BUFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFG vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF (BUFG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFGSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.44

2.52

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

3.42

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.46

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.42

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.20

15.93

+1.27

BUFG vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFG Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFG and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFGSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.52

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.59

+0.16

Drawdowns

BUFG vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFG drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFG and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFGSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-55.19%

+37.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.74%

-8.88%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.20%

-18.76%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.62%

-9.05%

+5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

1.91%

-0.82%

Volatility

BUFG vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF (BUFG) is 1.14%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that BUFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFGSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

2.75%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.82%

8.89%

-3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.63%

11.81%

-4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.84%

17.05%

-5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.84%

17.94%

-6.10%

BUFG vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFG has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFG vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

BUFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFG
FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.97%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, BUFG and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPY has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to BUFG (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFG dropped -17.62% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 3-year performance, SPY leads with 22.64% vs 14.41% for BUFG. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BUFG has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPY has performed better with a 22.64% return vs 14.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for BUFG.

SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for BUFG.

BUFG is categorized as Options Trading, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for BUFG and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFG and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer