PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRB vs. UDEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRB vs. UDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December (UDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with APRB having a 5.78% return and UDEC slightly higher at 6.03%.


APRB

1D
0.30%
1M
0.71%
6M
4.72%
YTD
5.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

UDEC

1D
0.48%
1M
0.86%
6M
5.15%
YTD
6.03%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.58K$46.66K$43.31K
$474.96K$390.03K$1.51M

APRB vs. UDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APRB and UDEC is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRB vs. UDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

APRB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


UDEC
UDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
UDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
UDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

APRB vs. UDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December (UDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APRBUDECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.84

APRB vs. UDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APRB vs. UDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRB drawdown since its inception was -4.59%, smaller than the maximum UDEC drawdown of -13.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRB and UDEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRBUDECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-13.37%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.65%

-2.12%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

Volatility

APRB vs. UDEC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRBUDECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.72%

6.68%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.72%

7.26%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.72%

7.98%

-2.26%

APRB vs. UDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than UDEC's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRB vs. UDEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRB nor UDEC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, APRB and UDEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UDEC.

APRB and UDEC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for APRB and 0.79% for UDEC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRB and UDEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer