APRB vs. UAPR
APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) and UAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. APRB is actively managed, while UAPR is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. APRB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UAPR.
Performance
APRB vs. UAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APRB achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than UAPR's 7.60% return.
APRB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UAPR
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 1Y
- 12.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- —
APRB vs. UAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 5.47% | 2.48% |
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April | 7.60% | 2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between APRB and UAPR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APRB vs. UAPR — Risk / Return Rank
APRB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UAPR
APRB vs. UAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APRB | UAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.87 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 11.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 51.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APRB vs. UAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APRB drawdown since its inception was -4.59%, smaller than the maximum UAPR drawdown of -14.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRB and UAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APRB | UAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -14.61% | +10.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -3.27% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.24% | — |
Volatility
APRB vs. UAPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APRB | UAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.81% | 3.27% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 6.90% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 8.38% | -2.57% |
APRB vs. UAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
APRB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than UAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
APRB vs. UAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither APRB nor UAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APRB and UAPR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UAPR.
APRB and UAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for APRB and 0.79% for UAPR.
Find the right allocation for APRB and UAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer