PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APPX vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APPX vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APPX achieves a -51.66% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.


APPX

1D
-11.50%
1M
36.86%
YTD
-51.66%
6M
-50.93%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
3.08%
1M
218.90%
YTD
961.23%
6M
1,422.01%
1Y
6,522.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APPX vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
APPX
Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF
-51.66%329.60%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
961.23%896.07%

Correlation

The correlation between APPX and MUU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APPX vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APPX
APPX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
APPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
APPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
APPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
APPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APPX vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APPXMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-50.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.91

-0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

125.85

-125.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.12

426.84

-426.71

APPX vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 50.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APPX and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APPXMUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

50.40

-50.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

6.68

-6.01

Drawdowns

APPX vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APPX drawdown since its inception was -82.40%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APPX and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APPXMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.40%

-75.07%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.40%

-52.72%

-29.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.42%

0.00%

-62.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.22%

-23.44%

-13.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.66%

15.51%

+33.15%

Volatility

APPX vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX) is 41.38%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 54.78%. This indicates that APPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APPXMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.38%

54.78%

-13.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

122.02%

105.07%

+16.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.00%

131.77%

+9.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

140.63%

133.67%

+6.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

140.63%

133.67%

+6.96%

APPX vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

APPX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

APPX vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

APPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.41%, more than MUU's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
APPX
Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF
19.41%9.38%0.00%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.46%4.27%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


APPX and MUU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to APPX (41.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APPX dropped -82.40% vs MUU's -75.07%.

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 6522.95% vs 6.06% for APPX. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, APPX has been the lower-risk option at 41.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 6522.95% return vs 6.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for APPX.

APPX has the higher dividend yield at 19.41%, compared with 0.46% for MUU.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for APPX and 1.06% for MUU.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APPX and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer