APO vs. AMLP
APO (Apollo Global Management, Inc.) is a stock, while AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Over the past 10 years, APO returned 27.76%/yr vs 6.80%/yr for AMLP. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APO vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APO achieves a -13.48% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 19.32% return. Over the past 10 years, APO has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 27.76%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.80% annualized return.
APO
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -10.30%
- 6M
- -13.11%
- YTD
- -13.48%
- 1Y
- -17.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- 19.36%
- 10Y*
- 27.76%
AMLP
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- YTD
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- 19.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
APO vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | -13.48% | -11.12% | 79.87% | 49.44% | -9.59% | 53.25% | 8.00% | 106.46% | -22.03% | 85.29% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 19.32% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between APO and AMLP is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011 | 0.33 |
The correlation between APO and AMLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APO vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
APO
AMLP
APO vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APO | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.28 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 2.27 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 6.33 | -7.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APO vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APO drawdown since its inception was -56.99%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APO and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APO | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.99% | -77.19% | +20.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.97% | -8.94% | -26.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.82% | -14.27% | -28.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.82% | -20.92% | -21.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.48% | -72.62% | +19.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.89% | -1.62% | -27.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.46% | -17.31% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.68% | 3.20% | +14.48% |
Volatility
APO vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) has a higher volatility of 10.62% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 5.08%. This indicates that APO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APO | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.62% | 5.08% | +5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.96% | 9.66% | +18.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.96% | 12.59% | +23.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.22% | 19.68% | +17.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.88% | 27.64% | +10.24% |
Dividends
APO vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
APO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than AMLP's 7.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.45% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 2.38% | 1.38% | 1.10% | 1.81% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 4.72% | 4.23% | 7.86% | 5.53% | 6.46% | 12.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APO and AMLP have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APO has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to AMLP (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APO dropped -56.99% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APO and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer