APMU vs. RGLO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

APMU (ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF) and RGLO (Russell Investments Global Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by ActivePassive, while RGLO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Russell. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APMU returned 4.28% vs 28.28% for RGLO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APMU charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for RGLO.

Performance

APMU vs. RGLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) and Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APMU achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than RGLO's 10.04% return.

APMU

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 0.72%
• 1Y: 4.28%
• 3Y*: 3.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RGLO

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 4.54%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 6M: 11.57%
• 1Y: 28.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APMU vs. RGLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	0.44%	3.84%
RGLO Russell Investments Global Equity ETF	10.04%	17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between APMU and RGLO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

APMU vs. RGLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APMU

APMU Risk / Return Rank: 49
APMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
APMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
APMU Omega Ratio Rank: 63
APMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
APMU Martin Ratio Rank: 35

RGLO

RGLO Risk / Return Rank: 68
RGLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
RGLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
RGLO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RGLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
RGLO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APMU vs. RGLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) and Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APMU	RGLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.23	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	3.09	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.40	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	2.96	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.30	13.33	-8.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APMU vs. RGLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the RGLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APMU and RGLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APMU	RGLO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	2.23	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	2.29	-1.48

Drawdowns

APMU vs. RGLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APMU drawdown since its inception was -4.39%, smaller than the maximum RGLO drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APMU and RGLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	APMU	RGLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-9.61%	+5.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.40%	-9.61%	+7.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-1.10%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.93%	-1.16%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	2.13%	-1.32%

Volatility

APMU vs. RGLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) is 0.75%, while Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that APMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APMU	RGLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	3.65%	-2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.68%	9.90%	-8.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37%	12.72%	-10.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.81%	12.69%	-9.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.81%	12.69%	-9.88%

APMU vs. RGLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

APMU has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than RGLO's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

APMU vs. RGLO - Dividend Comparison

APMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than RGLO's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	2.66%	2.63%	2.42%	1.31%
RGLO Russell Investments Global Equity ETF	0.58%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APMU and RGLO in my portfolio?

APMU and RGLO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APMU or RGLO?

RGLO has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to APMU (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APMU dropped -4.39% vs RGLO's -9.61%.

Which ETF is better, APMU or RGLO?

On 1-year performance, RGLO leads with 28.28% vs 4.28% for APMU. On fees, APMU is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, APMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APMU or RGLO?

Over the 1-year period, RGLO has performed better with a 28.28% return vs 4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APMU or RGLO?

APMU is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for RGLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APMU or RGLO?

APMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.58% for RGLO.

What is the main difference between APMU and RGLO?

APMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while RGLO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for APMU and 0.49% for RGLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.