APMU vs. IBMM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

APMU (ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF) and IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. APMU is actively managed, while IBMM is passively managed. APMU charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMM.

Performance

APMU vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

APMU

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 0.72%
• 1Y: 4.28%
• 3Y*: 3.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBMM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APMU vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	-0.69%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

APMU vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APMU

APMU Risk / Return Rank: 49
APMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
APMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
APMU Omega Ratio Rank: 63
APMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
APMU Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APMU vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APMU	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.30	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APMU	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	—	—

Drawdowns

APMU vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APMU drawdown since its inception was -4.39%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APMU and IBMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	APMU	IBMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	0.00%	-4.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	0.00%	-1.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.93%	0.00%	-0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	APMU	IBMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.68%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37%	0.00%	+2.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.81%	0.00%	+2.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.81%	0.00%	+2.81%

APMU vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

APMU has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

APMU vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

APMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	2.66%	2.63%	2.42%	1.31%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, APMU or IBMM?

On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, APMU or IBMM?

IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for APMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APMU or IBMM?

APMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

What is the main difference between APMU and IBMM?

They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for APMU and 0.18% for IBMM.