APMU vs. COIW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

APMU (ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF) and COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by ActivePassive, while COIW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APMU returned 3.04% vs -69.18% for COIW. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. APMU charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for COIW.

Performance

APMU vs. COIW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) and COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APMU achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than COIW's -36.27% return.

APMU

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.31%
• 6M: -0.44%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 1Y: 3.04%
• 3Y*: 2.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COIW

• 1D: -4.37%
• 1M: -6.40%
• 6M: -40.21%
• YTD: -36.27%
• 1Y: -69.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APMU vs. COIW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	0.32%	3.93%
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	-36.27%	-25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between APMU and COIW is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	-0.06

Return for Risk

APMU vs. COIW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APMU

APMU Risk / Return Rank: 38
APMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
APMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
APMU Omega Ratio Rank: 45
APMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
APMU Martin Ratio Rank: 30

COIW

COIW Risk / Return Rank: 2
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 2
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APMU vs. COIW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) and COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	APMU	COIW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	-0.85	+2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	-1.45	+3.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.84	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	-0.92	+2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.47	-1.32	+4.78

APMU vs. COIW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the COIW Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APMU and COIW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

APMU vs. COIW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APMU drawdown since its inception was -4.39%, smaller than the maximum COIW drawdown of -75.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APMU and COIW.

Drawdown Indicators

	APMU	COIW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-75.01%	+70.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.40%	-75.01%	+72.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-71.14%	+69.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.93%	-40.78%	+39.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	52.58%	-51.70%

Volatility

APMU vs. COIW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) is 0.77%, while COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a volatility of 19.62%. This indicates that APMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COIW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APMU	COIW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	19.62%	-18.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.81%	64.30%	-62.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48%	82.07%	-79.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.79%	89.66%	-86.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.79%	89.66%	-86.87%

APMU vs. COIW - Expense Ratio Comparison

APMU has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than COIW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

APMU vs. COIW - Dividend Comparison

APMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than COIW's 222.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	2.70%	2.63%	2.42%	1.31%
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	222.64%	120.37%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APMU and COIW in my portfolio?

APMU and COIW have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APMU or COIW?

COIW has higher volatility (19.62%) compared to APMU (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APMU dropped -4.39% vs COIW's -75.01%.

Which ETF is better, APMU or COIW?

On 1-year performance, APMU leads with 3.04% vs -69.18% for COIW. On fees, APMU is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, APMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APMU or COIW?

Over the 1-year period, APMU has performed better with a 3.04% return vs -69.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APMU or COIW?

APMU is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COIW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APMU or COIW?

COIW has the higher dividend yield at 222.64%, compared with 2.70% for APMU.

What is the main difference between APMU and COIW?

APMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while COIW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for APMU and 0.99% for COIW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.