APM.TO vs. SCZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Andean Precious Metals Corp (APM.TO) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ).

SCZ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007.

Performance

APM.TO vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Andean Precious Metals Corp (APM.TO) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

APM.TO vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
APM.TO Andean Precious Metals Corp	-28.79%	771.43%
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF	2.50%	26.02%

Different Trading Currencies

APM.TO is traded in CAD, while SCZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCZ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APM.TO achieves a -28.79% return, which is significantly lower than SCZ's 2.50% return.

APM.TO

• 1D: 10.14%
• 1M: -33.81%
• YTD: -28.79%
• 6M: -16.27%
• 1Y: 331.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCZ

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -6.72%
• YTD: 2.50%
• 6M: 4.10%
• 1Y: 23.48%
• 3Y*: 14.37%
• 5Y*: 6.63%
• 10Y*: 8.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

APM.TO vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APM.TO

APM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
APM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
APM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
APM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
APM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
APM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

SCZ

SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 85
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APM.TO vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Andean Precious Metals Corp (APM.TO) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APM.TO	SCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.07	1.58	+2.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	2.11	+1.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.32	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.31	2.03	+4.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.18	7.88	+13.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APM.TO vs. SCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.07, which is higher than the SCZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APM.TO and SCZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APM.TO	SCZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.07	1.58	+2.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.24	0.73	+3.52

Correlation

The correlation between APM.TO and SCZ is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

APM.TO vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison

APM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APM.TO Andean Precious Metals Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF	3.26%	3.30%	3.50%	2.96%	1.99%	2.96%	1.52%	3.52%	2.79%	2.38%	2.82%	2.06%

Drawdowns

APM.TO vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APM.TO drawdown since its inception was -51.34%, which is greater than SCZ's maximum drawdown of -32.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APM.TO and SCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	APM.TO	SCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.34%	-61.86%	+10.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.34%	-11.43%	-39.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.14%	-8.53%	-31.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.06%	-13.17%	+4.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.29%	2.91%	+12.38%

Volatility

APM.TO vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison

Andean Precious Metals Corp (APM.TO) has a higher volatility of 27.11% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) at 7.17%. This indicates that APM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APM.TO	SCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.11%	7.17%	+19.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.09%	10.14%	+49.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.06%	14.91%	+67.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.01%	13.59%	+65.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.01%	14.59%	+64.42%