APM.TO vs. KGC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Andean Precious Metals Corp (APM.TO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC).

Performance

APM.TO vs. KGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Andean Precious Metals Corp (APM.TO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

APM.TO vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
APM.TO Andean Precious Metals Corp	-28.79%	771.43%
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation	9.98%	192.07%

Different Trading Currencies

APM.TO is traded in CAD, while KGC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KGC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap APM.TO : CA$1.05B KGC : $36.89B
EPS APM.TO : CA$0.51 KGC : $1.97
PE Ratio APM.TO : 13.50 KGC : 15.53
PEG Ratio APM.TO : 0.06 KGC : 0.21
PS Ratio APM.TO : 3.50 KGC : 5.27
PB Ratio APM.TO : 4.65 KGC : 4.31
Total Revenue (TTM) APM.TO : CA$298.94M KGC : $7.06B
Gross Profit (TTM) APM.TO : CA$112.98M KGC : $3.48B
EBITDA (TTM) APM.TO : CA$119.43M KGC : $4.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APM.TO achieves a -28.79% return, which is significantly lower than KGC's 9.98% return.

APM.TO

• 1D: 10.14%
• 1M: -33.81%
• YTD: -28.79%
• 6M: -16.27%
• 1Y: 331.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KGC

• 1D: 6.59%
• 1M: -15.76%
• YTD: 9.98%
• 6M: 23.02%
• 1Y: 135.41%
• 3Y*: 90.89%
• 5Y*: 39.64%
• 10Y*: 26.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

APM.TO vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APM.TO

APM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
APM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
APM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
APM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
APM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
APM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

KGC

KGC Risk / Return Rank: 94
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 92
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APM.TO vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Andean Precious Metals Corp (APM.TO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APM.TO	KGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.07	2.80	+1.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	2.87	+0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.41	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.31	4.67	+1.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.18	16.51	+4.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APM.TO vs. KGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.07, which is higher than the KGC Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APM.TO and KGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APM.TO	KGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.07	2.80	+1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.97	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.24	0.13	+4.11

Correlation

The correlation between APM.TO and KGC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

APM.TO vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison

APM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
APM.TO Andean Precious Metals Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation	0.44%	0.44%	1.29%	1.98%	2.93%	2.69%	0.82%

Drawdowns

APM.TO vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APM.TO drawdown since its inception was -51.34%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -91.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APM.TO and KGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	APM.TO	KGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.34%	-96.00%	+44.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.34%	-30.20%	-21.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.44%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.14%	-19.73%	-20.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.06%	-57.85%	+48.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.29%	8.52%	+6.77%

Volatility

APM.TO vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison

Andean Precious Metals Corp (APM.TO) has a higher volatility of 27.11% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 17.55%. This indicates that APM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APM.TO	KGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.11%	17.55%	+9.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.09%	40.06%	+20.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.06%	48.66%	+33.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.01%	41.17%	+37.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.01%	45.91%	+33.10%

Financials

APM.TO vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Andean Precious Metals Corp and Kinross Gold Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

APM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Andean Precious Metals Corp reported a gross profit of 36.77M and revenue of 90.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.

KGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.

APM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Andean Precious Metals Corp reported an operating income of 30.72M and revenue of 90.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.0%.

KGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 985.01M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.

APM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Andean Precious Metals Corp reported a net income of 43.74M and revenue of 90.42M, resulting in a net margin of 48.4%.

KGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 920.43M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 44.8%.