APLZ vs. LITX
APLZ (Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APLZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Applied Digital Corporation (APLD), while LITX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. APLZ is passively managed, while LITX is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.49% expense ratio.
Performance
APLZ vs. LITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APLZ
- 1D
- 5.04%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITX
- 1D
- 4.61%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APLZ vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
APLZ Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF | -85.94% |
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 273.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLZ and LITX is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLZ vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APLZ vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLZ drawdown since its inception was -91.78%, which is greater than LITX's maximum drawdown of -51.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLZ and LITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLZ | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.78% | -51.46% | -40.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.49% | -40.64% | -48.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.58% | -17.59% | -39.99% |
Volatility
APLZ vs. LITX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APLZ | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 219.87% | 194.79% | +25.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.87% | 194.79% | +25.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.87% | 194.79% | +25.08% |
APLZ vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both APLZ and LITX have an expense ratio of 1.49%.
Dividends
APLZ vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison
Neither APLZ nor LITX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
APLZ and LITX have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APLZ and LITX have the same expense ratio: 1.49% per year.
APLZ and LITX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
APLZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while LITX is Leveraged Equities.
Find the right allocation for APLZ and LITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer