PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLZ vs. ARCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APLZ vs. ARCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


APLZ

1D
21.29%
1M
-13.55%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARCX

1D
-26.35%
1M
-28.89%
YTD
-57.42%
6M
-68.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLZ vs. ARCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APLZ and ARCX is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026

-0.55

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLZ vs. ARCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APLZ vs. ARCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APLZARCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

-0.63

+0.19

Drawdowns

APLZ vs. ARCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLZ drawdown since its inception was -91.78%, roughly equal to the maximum ARCX drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLZ and ARCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLZARCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.78%

-91.51%

-0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.79%

-90.32%

+2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.63%

-64.61%

+10.98%

Volatility

APLZ vs. ARCX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLZARCXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

229.43%

140.73%

+88.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

229.43%

140.73%

+88.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

229.43%

140.73%

+88.70%

APLZ vs. ARCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APLZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ARCX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

APLZ vs. ARCX - Dividend Comparison

Neither APLZ nor ARCX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


APLZ and ARCX have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARCX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARCX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for APLZ.

APLZ and ARCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

APLZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ARCX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for APLZ and 1.30% for ARCX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLZ and ARCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer