PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLY vs. XAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

APLY vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

APLY vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLY achieves a -5.57% return, which is significantly lower than XAPR's 1.10% return.


APLY

1D
3.07%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-5.57%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
10.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XAPR

1D
0.22%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.10%
6M
2.86%
1Y
12.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


APLY vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

APLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

APLY vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLY
APLY Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
APLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLY Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
APLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APLY vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APLYXAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

1.51

-1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

2.48

-1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.66

-0.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

2.01

-1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.93

18.98

-17.05

APLY vs. XAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the XAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLY and XAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APLYXAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

1.51

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.78

-1.33

Correlation

The correlation between APLY and XAPR is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

APLY vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison

APLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.63%, while XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

APLY vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLY drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, which is greater than XAPR's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLY and XAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


APLYXAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.41%

-6.18%

-24.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.07%

-6.18%

-14.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.85%

0.00%

-8.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-0.18%

-6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.05%

0.65%

+5.40%

Volatility

APLY vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) at 0.45%. This indicates that APLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


APLYXAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

0.45%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

1.19%

+11.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.93%

8.15%

+18.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.16%

6.41%

+14.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.16%

6.41%

+14.75%