APLY vs. QQQY
APLY (YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF) and QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QQQY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APLY returned 36.14% vs 36.38% for QQQY. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
APLY vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APLY achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 19.07% return.
APLY
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 9.06%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 36.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 19.07%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 36.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APLY vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 9.41% | 4.69% | 18.62% | 9.10% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 19.07% | 14.96% | 7.70% | 7.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLY and QQQY is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLY vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank
APLY
QQQY
APLY vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APLY | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.49 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 3.28 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.87 | 13.95 | -6.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APLY | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.68 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 1.25 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
APLY vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLY drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLY and QQQY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLY | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.41% | -19.05% | -11.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -11.14% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.36% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.93% | -2.91% | -4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 2.61% | +1.99% |
Volatility
APLY vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) have volatilities of 4.12% and 4.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APLY | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 4.21% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 11.30% | +1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.99% | 13.67% | +4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 14.75% | +6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 14.75% | +6.22% |
APLY vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both APLY and QQQY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
APLY vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison
APLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.76%, more than QQQY's 34.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 34.76% | 36.38% | 24.95% | 14.36% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 34.34% | 45.34% | 83.34% | 20.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APLY and QQQY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to APLY (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLY dropped -30.41% vs QQQY's -19.05%.
On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs 36.14% for APLY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs 36.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
APLY and QQQY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
APLY has the higher dividend yield at 34.76%, compared with 34.34% for QQQY.
APLY is categorized as Options Trading, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Defiance.
QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APLY and QQQY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer