APLY vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

APLY (YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. APLY is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, APLY returned 36.14% vs 4.54% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. APLY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

APLY vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLY achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.

APLY

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 9.06%
• YTD: 9.41%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 36.14%
• 3Y*: 11.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLY vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF	9.41%	4.69%	18.62%	9.62%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.37%	4.96%	5.25%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between APLY and IBIC is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023	-0.01

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between APLY and IBIC has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.23, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

APLY vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLY

APLY Risk / Return Rank: 57
APLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
APLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
APLY Omega Ratio Rank: 60
APLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
APLY Martin Ratio Rank: 47

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APLY vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APLY	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	5.05	-3.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	9.12	-6.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	2.24	-0.87
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	17.27	-14.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.87	67.45	-59.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APLY vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLY Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLY and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APLY	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	5.05	-3.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	3.49	-2.81

Drawdowns

APLY vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLY drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLY and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	APLY	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.41%	-0.90%	-29.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.76%	-0.26%	-11.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-0.13%	-0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.93%	-0.10%	-6.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.60%	0.07%	+4.53%

Volatility

APLY vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that APLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APLY	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.12%	0.33%	+3.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.03%	0.67%	+12.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.99%	0.90%	+17.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.97%	1.58%	+19.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.97%	1.58%	+19.39%

APLY vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

APLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

APLY vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

APLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.76%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF	34.76%	36.38%	24.95%	14.36%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.59%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APLY and IBIC in my portfolio?

APLY and IBIC have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APLY or IBIC?

APLY has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLY dropped -30.41% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, APLY or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, APLY leads with 36.14% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APLY or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, APLY has performed better with a 36.14% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APLY or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for APLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APLY or IBIC?

APLY has the higher dividend yield at 34.76%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

What is the main difference between APLY and IBIC?

APLY is categorized as Options Trading, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for APLY and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.