APLU vs. IMTB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

APLU (Allspring Core Plus ETF) and IMTB (iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. APLU is actively managed, while IMTB is passively managed. Over the past year, APLU returned 5.67% vs 5.97% for IMTB. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. APLU charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMTB.

Performance

APLU vs. IMTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLU achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly higher than IMTB's -0.02% return.

APLU

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: 0.45%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMTB

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 6M: 0.07%
• 1Y: 5.97%
• 3Y*: 4.75%
• 5Y*: 0.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLU vs. IMTB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
APLU Allspring Core Plus ETF	0.35%	7.38%	-1.93%
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF	-0.02%	8.88%	-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between APLU and IMTB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024	0.85

The correlation between APLU and IMTB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

APLU vs. IMTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLU

APLU Risk / Return Rank: 40
APLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
APLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
APLU Omega Ratio Rank: 40
APLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
APLU Martin Ratio Rank: 40

IMTB

IMTB Risk / Return Rank: 42
IMTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IMTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
IMTB Omega Ratio Rank: 40
IMTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
IMTB Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APLU vs. IMTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APLU	IMTB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.48	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	2.25	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.26	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	2.10	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.22	6.51	-0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APLU vs. IMTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the IMTB Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLU and IMTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APLU	IMTB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	1.48	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.36	+0.39

Drawdowns

APLU vs. IMTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLU drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum IMTB drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLU and IMTB.

Drawdown Indicators

	APLU	IMTB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.24%	-18.15%	+14.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	-2.86%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.80%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-1.74%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.89%	-4.13%	+3.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	0.92%	-0.01%

Volatility

APLU vs. IMTB - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) have volatilities of 1.44% and 1.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APLU	IMTB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.44%	1.45%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.82%	3.02%	-0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.05%	4.05%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.06%	6.28%	-1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.06%	5.18%	-0.12%

APLU vs. IMTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

APLU has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IMTB's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

APLU vs. IMTB - Dividend Comparison

APLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, more than IMTB's 4.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
APLU Allspring Core Plus ETF	5.43%	5.13%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF	4.52%	4.40%	4.42%	4.13%	2.90%	2.49%	2.63%	2.91%	3.04%	2.75%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APLU and IMTB in my portfolio?

APLU and IMTB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APLU or IMTB?

IMTB has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to APLU (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLU dropped -3.24% vs IMTB's -18.15%.

Which ETF is better, APLU or IMTB?

On 1-year performance, IMTB leads with 5.97% vs 5.67% for APLU. On fees, IMTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APLU or IMTB?

Over the 1-year period, IMTB has performed better with a 5.97% return vs 5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APLU or IMTB?

IMTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for APLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APLU or IMTB?

APLU has the higher dividend yield at 5.43%, compared with 4.52% for IMTB.

What is the main difference between APLU and IMTB?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for APLU and 0.06% for IMTB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.