APLU vs. EUSB
APLU (Allspring Core Plus ETF) and EUSB (iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. APLU is actively managed, while EUSB is passively managed. Over the past year, APLU returned 6.60% vs 6.18% for EUSB. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. APLU charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUSB.
Performance
APLU vs. EUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APLU achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than EUSB's 0.75% return.
APLU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 6.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUSB
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 4.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
APLU vs. EUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
APLU Allspring Core Plus ETF | 0.71% | 7.38% | -1.93% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 0.75% | 7.45% | -1.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLU and EUSB is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between APLU and EUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLU vs. EUSB — Risk / Return Rank
APLU
EUSB
APLU vs. EUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APLU | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 1.70 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 2.54 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 2.59 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.28 | 8.93 | -1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APLU | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.70 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.07 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
APLU vs. EUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLU drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum EUSB drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLU and EUSB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLU | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -17.87% | +14.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -2.42% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.75% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -6.61% | +5.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 0.70% | +0.09% |
Volatility
APLU vs. EUSB - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) has a higher volatility of 1.66% compared to iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) at 1.41%. This indicates that APLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| APLU | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 1.41% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 2.39% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.24% | 3.67% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.11% | 5.75% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.11% | 5.45% | -0.34% |
APLU vs. EUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
APLU has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSB's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
APLU vs. EUSB - Dividend Comparison
APLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than EUSB's 3.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APLU Allspring Core Plus ETF | 5.31% | 5.13% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.89% | 3.84% | 3.67% | 3.08% | 2.21% | 1.10% | 0.57% |