PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLD vs. PWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APLD vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with APLD having a 66.99% return and PWR slightly lower at 64.46%. Over the past 10 years, APLD has outperformed PWR with an annualized return of 120.60%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively lower 40.58% annualized return.


APLD

1D
3.34%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
66.99%
6M
27.51%
1Y
195.42%
3Y*
72.37%
5Y*
111.39%
10Y*
120.60%

PWR

1D
-0.19%
1M
-6.87%
YTD
64.46%
6M
49.89%
1Y
92.19%
3Y*
56.18%
5Y*
49.77%
10Y*
40.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLD vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
66.99%220.94%13.35%266.30%-56.09%11,789.90%389.44%-34.55%64.99%-33.33%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
64.46%33.70%46.60%51.70%24.63%59.50%77.74%35.84%-22.93%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between APLD and PWR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2008

0.11

Over the past year, APLD and PWR have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APLD:

$11.12B

PWR:

$105.52B

EPS

APLD:

-$0.72

PWR:

$7.29

PS Ratio

APLD:

27.75

PWR:

3.51

PB Ratio

APLD:

7.06

PWR:

11.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

APLD:

$390.57M

PWR:

$29.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APLD:

$124.93M

PWR:

$4.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

APLD:

-$154.66M

PWR:

$2.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLD vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLD
APLD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
APLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
APLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

PWR
PWR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APLD vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APLDPWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

7.45

-3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

17.97

-8.82

APLD vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLD and PWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APLDPWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.55

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

1.41

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

1.21

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.35

-0.27

Drawdowns

APLD vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLD drawdown since its inception was -99.70%, roughly equal to the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLD and PWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLDPWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.70%

-97.07%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.31%

-12.45%

-37.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.66%

-33.89%

-42.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.61%

-33.89%

-48.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.80%

-45.53%

-44.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.53%

-11.64%

-5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.49%

-46.86%

-27.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.15%

5.15%

+17.00%

Volatility

APLD vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) has a higher volatility of 32.64% compared to Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) at 11.16%. This indicates that APLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLDPWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.64%

11.16%

+21.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.09%

29.60%

+50.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.26%

36.37%

+70.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

165.20%

35.62%

+129.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

301.59%

33.70%

+267.89%

Dividends

APLD vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

APLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.06%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%

Financials

APLD vs. PWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Digital Corporation and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
161.76M
7.87B
(APLD) Total Revenue
(PWR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

APLD vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Applied Digital Corporation and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
51.0%
14.1%
Portfolio components
APLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a gross profit of 82.52M and revenue of 161.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.0%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

APLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported an operating income of -62.13M and revenue of 161.76M, resulting in an operating margin of -38.4%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

APLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a net income of -104.11M and revenue of 161.76M, resulting in a net margin of -64.4%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APLD and PWR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APLD has higher volatility (32.64%) compared to PWR (11.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLD dropped -99.70% vs PWR's -97.07%.

PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLD and PWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer