APLD vs. PG
APLD (Applied Digital Corporation) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. APLD operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, APLD returned 125.13%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for PG. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APLD vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APLD achieves a 74.14% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, APLD has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 125.13%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
APLD
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -8.58%
- YTD
- 74.14%
- 6M
- 53.27%
- 1Y
- 281.93%
- 3Y*
- 69.23%
- 5Y*
- 112.30%
- 10Y*
- 125.13%
PG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- -3.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
APLD vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APLD Applied Digital Corporation | 74.14% | 220.94% | 13.35% | 266.30% | -56.09% | 11,789.90% | 389.44% | -34.55% | 64.99% | -33.33% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.93% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLD and PG is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2008 | 0.00 |
The correlation between APLD and PG shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
APLD:
$11.60B
PG:
$361.53B
APLD:
-$0.72
PG:
$5.23
APLD:
28.94
PG:
4.20
APLD:
7.37
PG:
6.70
APLD:
$390.57M
PG:
$86.72B
APLD:
$124.93M
PG:
$43.64B
APLD:
-$154.66M
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLD vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
APLD
PG
APLD vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APLD | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.97 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | -0.37 | +5.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.72 | -0.68 | +12.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APLD vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLD drawdown since its inception was -99.73%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLD and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLD | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.73% | -54.25% | -45.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.31% | -15.52% | -34.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.66% | -21.15% | -55.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.61% | -23.77% | -58.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.80% | -23.77% | -66.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.00% | -13.29% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.86% | -12.16% | -62.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.22% | 8.80% | +12.42% |
Volatility
APLD vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) has a higher volatility of 33.15% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.99%. This indicates that APLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APLD | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.15% | 6.99% | +26.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 80.49% | 15.01% | +65.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.13% | 18.78% | +88.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 165.20% | 17.82% | +147.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 301.46% | 19.05% | +282.41% |
Dividends
APLD vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
APLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APLD Applied Digital Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
APLD vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Digital Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
APLD vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
APLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a gross profit of 82.52M and revenue of 161.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.0%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
APLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported an operating income of -62.13M and revenue of 161.76M, resulting in an operating margin of -38.4%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
APLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a net income of -104.11M and revenue of 161.76M, resulting in a net margin of -64.4%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
APLD and PG have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APLD has higher volatility (33.15%) compared to PG (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLD dropped -99.73% vs PG's -54.25%.
APLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APLD and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer